‘‘It wouldn’t be a long-term commitment’’, Imran told The Indian Express.
‘‘We are looking at an initial eight-week run leading up to the US Open.’’ t’s a decision long overdue, but better late than never. As Imran said, ‘‘If we have to improve then we have to get professional.’’
So how would a coach help Sania? The most basic benefit would be having a hitting partner on tour. So far the help she gets is amateurish, though well-meaning, but for a player as dependent on rhythm and timing as she is, it is a gaping hole in her match preparation.
‘‘That half-an-hour stint is usually enough for any player to enter a match in a positive frame of mind’’, Imran says.
The more important benefit would, of course, be having someone sort out her technical flaws, chief of which is her very poor serve.
While Sania trained under various top coaches in India, it was only after 10 years that Krishna Bhupathi pointed out that she had a problem with her service — which Bob Brett was called in to correct. She’s now improved her first service to a 60-per cent average.
Yet her serve remains a serious technical flaw and severe handicap, one that she has to counter with other weapons. Her will to perform under pressure (witness her recovery from 2-5 to 4-5 in the third set against Svetlana) coupled with a stinging, accurate forehand, are two of her most potent weapons.
As Vijay Amritraj observed before her match against Svetlana, Sania’s backhand and forehand can match the best in the world, ‘‘but a little work on her approach to the net and on her service can work wonders’’.
Sania has displayed her talent, now she has to deliver on it. To do that, she must make up a lot of lost ground on the big stars — Maria Sharapova, for example — who have been coached by the best since the age of eight or nine.
A travelling coach is a good first step. And living out of India wouldn’t be a bad second step.
No comments:
Post a Comment